montanaanna.blogg.se

1. Truecrypt vs bitlocker mac os#
2. Truecrypt vs bitlocker upgrade#
3. Truecrypt vs bitlocker software#
4. Truecrypt vs bitlocker code#

Also, unlike TrueCrypt, PGP Whole Disk Encryption can scale for networked environments and can be managed using a networked console, the PGP Universal Gateway, which manages the keys and other enterprise aspects of the platform.

Truecrypt vs bitlocker mac os#

At a Glanceįor example, unlike BitLocker, PGP Whole Disk Encryption works with a number of platforms, including 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Windows 2003, XP, Vista and Mac OS X. However, that price tag delivers some capabilities not found in other products. Unlike BitLocker, which is bundled with Windows 7, and TrueCrypt, which is free, PGP Whole Disk Encryption comes with a price tag: $149 per seat. The management console runs as a desktop application - similar in design to both BitLocker and TrueCrypt - offering wizards, interactive help and tools to encrypt and decrypt data files stored on encrypted volumes. PGP Whole Disk Encryption offers all of the same basic features as BitLocker and TrueCrypt. For the mobile worker and the individual user, PGP Whole Disk Protection is a very good choice for protecting the data on a hard drive. The company offers a wide variety of products that help users encrypt data files, e-mails and many other types of data. Over the years, PGP has become one of the leaders in encryption technologies.

Truecrypt vs bitlocker code#

has been around since 2002, but the company's roots go back to 1991, when the code base for Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) was developed. So while BitLocker is more resilient to opportunistic EM attacks (it takes more to re-develop a spoofed user interaction screen for BitLocker than just copy the EM tool for trucrypt on a USB key), it's not 100% bulletproof (no solution is).PGP Corp. There are ways of defeating BitLocker+TPM ( article, paper) but no public tools available AFAIK. Note than BitLocker will be more resilient than TrueCrypt only if used on a TPM-enabled computer. I suggest you read the articles of Joanna Rutkowska on both products :īut if you're sure that your coworkers will always take good care of their laptops - with safety case and all, you can go for TrueCrypt.Īdditionnal details about BitLocker and EM attacks : With Evil Maid (EM) attack tools now available for TrueCrypt, I'd go for BitLocker if I had the budget, because EM-like attacks are quite more complicated, and it integrates better with AD etc as Oskar Duveborn stated. That means an 80Gb encrypted partition creates an 80Gb image file :( The next problem I face is imaging (Acronis/Ghost/.) encrypted drives will not work unless I perform sector-by-sector imaging.

Truecrypt vs bitlocker software#

Ideally I am also interested in 'real world' experience from people who are using drive encryption software and any pitfalls to look out for.ĭecided to go with TrueCrypt for the following reasons:ī) I am not managing a large quantity of laptops so integration with Active Directory, Management consoles etc is not a huge benefitĬ) Although eks did make a good point about Evil Maid (EM) attacks, our data is not that desirable to consider it a major factorĭ) The cost (free) is a big plus but not the primary motivator

Truecrypt vs bitlocker upgrade#

Can anyone offer suggestions on the best course of action:Ī) Use BitLocker, bite the bullet and pay to upgrade to Enterprise/Ultimateī) Pay for another 3rd party drive encryption product that is cheaper (suggestions appreciated)Ĭ) Use a free drive encryption product such as TrueCrypt Windows BitLocker seems the obvious choice, but it looks like I need to purchase either Windows 7 Enterprise or Ultimate editions to get it. Due to the nature of our business I will need drive encryption. I will soon be purchasing a number of laptops running Windows 7 for our mobile staff.